Bile Beans was a laxative and tonic first marketed in the 1890s. The product supposedly contained substances extracted from a hitherto unknown vegetable source by a fictitious chemist known as Charles Forde. In the early years Bile Beans were marketed as “Charles Forde’s Bile Beans for Biliousness”, and sales relied heavily on newspaper advertisements. Among other cure-all claims, Bile Beans promised to “disperse unwanted fat” and “purify and enrich the blood”.
Although the manufacturer claimed that the formula for Bile Beans was based on a vegetable source known only to Aboriginal Australians, its actual ingredients, which included cascara, rhubarb, liquorice and menthol, were commonly found in pharmacies of the period. A court case initiated in Scotland in 1905 found that the Bile Bean Manufacturing Company’s business was based on a fraud and conducted fraudulently, but Bile Beans nevertheless continued to be sold until the 1980s.
Formulation and manufacture
Charles Edward Fulford (1870–1906) and Ernest Albert Gilbert (1875–1905) first sold Bile Beans in Australia in late 1897, marketed as “Gould’s Bile Beans”. Fulford was a Canadian who had travelled to Australia to sell Dr. Williams’ Pink Pills for Pale People for his uncle, George Taylor Fulford.
Fulford and Gilbert established the Bile Bean Manufacturing Company in Leeds, England, in 1899. It was claimed that the formula for Bile Beans was created by an Australian scientist Charles Forde in 1898, based on research he had conducted on a vegetable source known only to Aboriginal Australians. In reality, Charles Forde did not exist; the name was used as an alias for Charles Fulford, who had no scientific training. The beans were initially manufactured in America by Parke Davis & Co. of Detroit, until the Bile Bean Manufacturing Company set up a production facility in Leeds, England, trading under the name of C. E. Fulford Limited, which also sold other patent medicines, including the Zam-Buk ointment,[a] Zam-Buk was manufactured by the Zam-Buk Company of Leeds, another of Charles Fulford’s enterprises. Pep pastilles and later Vitapointe hair conditioner.[b]The principle production plant moved to Blyth, Northumberland in 1963.
The product sold by Fulford and Gilbert was not the first patent medicine marketed as “Bile Beans”. A different type of Bile Beans was invented by James F. Smith, a chemist from Texarkana, Texas, in the 1870s or 1880s, and J.F. Smith & Co traded out of St Louis, Mo. The firm also produced a product called “Smith’s Blood Beans”, claimed to “purify the blood” and was “put up in packages similar to Bile Beans” with “sugar coating blood red in color”, and a “wrapper … lithographed in red ink instead of black”. In 1902 the Bile Bean Manufacturing Company acquired the trade mark of “J. F. Smith’s Bile Beans” in the UK, which had been registered in 1887.
According to a 1903 report published in the British Medical Journal, the chief ingredients of Bile Beans were cascara, rhubarb, liquorice and menthol, packaged as a gelatine-coated pill, all ingredients commonly found in pharmacies of the period. It was not until 1941 that English companies were legally required to disclose the active ingredients in their non-prescription drugs. By the 1940s, the ingredients included various purgatives, cholagogues, and carminatives, including aloin (aloe), Podophyllum, cascara, scammony, jalap, colocynth, leptandrin, saponis (soap), cardamom, capsicum, ginger, peppermint oil, and gentian, mixed with liquorice, powdered gum (acacia or tragacanth) and glucose, coated with black charcoal or carbon powder to form ovoid pills.
Findings of fraud
In 1905 the Bile Beans Manufacturing Company initiated a passing off court case in Scotland against an Edinburgh chemist, George Graham Davidson, who sold “Davidson’s Bile Beans”, seeking to prevent him from selling any product using the name “bile beans” except that supplied by the company. The presiding judge, Lord Ardwall, rejected the case, as he considered that the plaintiff’s business was “founded on, and conducted by fraud”, there being no secret ingredient and no connection with any plant found in Australia. The Court of Session dismissed an appeal, because it considered that the Bile Bean Manufacturing Company had deliberately defrauded the public by making false factual statements about the product, concluding that it was not entitled to any legal protection against the use of the term “bile beans”.
After setting up in England in 1899 the company spent about £60,000 a year in advertising its products, and according to Birmingham University Professor of Medicine Robert Saundby, “created a demand by flooding the country with advertisements, placards, pamphlets and imaginary pictures.” Early newspaper promotions usually took the form of testimonials proclaiming “miraculous life changing cures”. Often illustrated, they included letters from customers cured of lost appetites, severe headaches, indigestion and biliousness. A half-page advertisement in the Sheffield Evening Telegraph on 12 October 1900 featured a lady who had been cured by Bile Beans after ten doctors had failed to successfully treat her condition; copies of signed affidavits from neighbours were also printed. The level of advertising was not curtailed despite the adverse comments made by the judges in the court ruling.
Among the more unusual marketing promotions undertaken by the Bile Beans Manufacturing Company was the “Bile Bean March”, composed by Charles Fulford’s older brother Frank Harris FulfordCanadian-born entrepreneur, art collector and businessman and first published in 1898. The music was described as “a bold, spirited composition” in a 1902 newspaper report. Readers could apply to receive a free copy of the sheet music by sending their address details to the company. Another marketing ploy was the production of a cookery book, which was also made widely available free of charge. A Bile Bean Puzzle Book was published during the early 1930s and also freely distributed. By that time advertising for Bile Beans had become increasingly targeted at women, promising them health, bright eyes and a slim figure if taken regularly.
When Radio Luxembourg started longwave commercial radio broadcasts in English in 1933, its first advertisers were Fulford’s Bile Beans and Zam-Buk.
During the 1940s newspaper advertising was supplemented by a poster campaign. Aimed at maintaining high levels of purchasing by women, the posters featured young ladies dressed to participate in various activities, including horse riding, swimming and hiking; the designs were the work of S. H. Benson, a London advertising agency whose clients included Bovril and Guinness. The Bulletin of the North Carolina State Board of Health hypothesised in 1916–17 that many provincial newspapers relied heavily on the revenues generated by advertisements from manufacturers of suspect remedies, and it speculated that editorial control had been applied to restrict extensive reporting of the Bile Beans court case. Similar suspicions had been raised almost ten years earlier by medical director Eric Pritchard, who went on to highlight a clause showing newspaper advertising contracts could be revoked if the publication carried any material considered “detrimental to the Company’s interest”.
Gilbert died in 1905 and Charles Fulford the following year in Australia, aged 36, after which the business was run by Charles’s older brother, Frank Harris Fulford. Charles’s estate was valued at £1.3 million, around £128 million today. He made several bequests which included the gift of twenty per cent of the company shares to the British charity Barnardo’s, although this conditional donation sparked consternation. The clauses stipulated the charity must set up a limited company that would only sell Bile Beans and patent medicines manufactured by Fulford’s businesses; additionally, Barnardo’s were forbidden to sell any of the shares. A writer in the British Medical Journal suggested the bequest presented the charity with an ethical dilemma as it enjoyed the patronage from both medical and religious professions so to trade in products described by a judge as fraudulent would be perpetuating the deception. Initially Barnardo’s refused the gift but eventually accepted an unconditional lump sum.
Despite the Bile Beans Manufacturing Company having lost the Scottish court case in 1906, Bile Beans remained popular through the 1930s, and continued to be sold until the 1980s. The business was so successful that Frank Fulford was able to purchase Headingley Castle in Leeds in 1909, and to donate artworks to the museum at Temple Newsam.
- &nbe="citation_2"> p. 22
- &nbe="citation_4">&nbe="citation_5">&nbe="citation_6">&nbe="citation_7">&nbe="citation_8">&nbe="citation_9">&nbe="citation_10"> p. 133
- &nbe="citation_12">&nbe="citation_13">&nbe="citation_14">&nbe="citation_15">&nbe="citation_16">4928910 items 1 default asc993WQ}"]&nbe="citation_17">&nbe="citation_18"> p. 5Arnold-Baker, C. (2001) ‘Land Tenure – England’, in The Companion to British History. 2nd edn. Routledge.Staff writer (2006) ‘socage’, in Knowles, E. (ed.) Oxford Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. online. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198609810.001.0001/acref-9780198609810-e-6593?rskey=VnUUHp&result=5.Surman, R. (2015) Cathedral Cats. ebook. HarperCollins.Exeter Cathedral (2010) ‘The Cathedral Church of St Peter in Exeter’.Harris, P. V. (1977) ‘More about Robin Hood’, Folklore, 88(2), pp. 236–237.Shippey, T. A. (2013) ‘The Tale of Gamelyn: Class Warfare and the Embarrassments of a Genre’, in Putter, A. and Gilbert, J. (eds) The Spirit of Medieval English Popular Romance. Routledge, pp. 78–96.Bothwell, J. S. (2004) Edward III and the English Peerage: Royal Patronage, Social Mobility, and Political Control in Fourteenth-century England. Boydell Press.Rose, J. (2017) Maintenance in Medieval England. Cambridge University Press.Ayton, A. (2007) ‘The English Army at Crécy’, in Preston, P. (ed.) The Battle of Crécy, 1346. Boydell Press, pp. 159–251.Kaminsky, H. (2002) ‘The Noble Feud in the Later Middle Ages’, Past & Present, 177, pp. 55–83.Post, J. B. (1985) ‘The Evidential Value of Approvers’ Appeals: The Case of William Rose, 1389’, Law and History Review, 3, pp. 91–100. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/743698.Hanawalt, B. A. (1999) ‘Ballads and Bandits: Fourteenth-Century Outlaws and the Robin Hood Poems’, in Knight, S. T. (ed.) Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism. Boydell & Brewer, pp. 3–38.Scattergood, J. (1994) ‘The Tale of Gamelyn: The Noble Robber as Provincial Hero’, in Meale, C. M. (ed.) Readings in Medieval English Romance. Boydell & Brewer, pp. 159–194.Revard, C. (2005) ‘The Outlaw’s Song of Trailbaston’, in Ohlgren, T. H. (ed.) Medieval Outlaws: Twelve Tales in Modern English Translation. Parlor Press, pp. 151–164.Historical Manuscripts Commission (1911) Report on the Manuscripts of Lord Middleton.Hanna, R. and Turville-Petre, T. (2010) The History of a Family Collection, The Wollaton Medieval Manuscripts: Texts, Owners and Readers. Boydell & Brewer.Bubenicek, M. and Partington, R. (2015) ‘Justice, Law and Lawyers’, in Fletcher, C., Genet, J.-P., and Watts, J. (eds) Government and Political Life in England and France, c. 1300–c. 1500. Cambridge University Press.Kaeuper, R. W. (1988) War, Justice, and Public Order: England and France in the Later Middle Ages. Clarendon Press.Payling, S. J. (1991) Political Society in Lancastrian England: The Greater Gentry of Nottinghamshire. Clarendon Press.Aberth, J. (1996) Criminal Churchmen in the Age of Edward III: The Case of Bishop Thomas de Lisle. Pennsylvania State University Press.Spraggs, G. (2001) Outlaws and Highwaymen: The Cult of the Robber in England from the Middke Ages to the Nineteenth Century. Pimlico.Richmond, C. (2002) The Paston Family in the Fifteenth Century: Falstaff’s Will. Cambridge University Press.Musson, A. and Powell, E. (2009) Crime, Law and Society in the Later Middle Ages. Manchester University Press (Manchester Medieval Sources).Pennine Waterways (no date) History of the Calder and Hebble Navigation. Available at: http://www.penninewaterways.co.uk/calder/chn2.htm (Accessed: 21 November 2020).Gray, D. (1999) ‘The Robin Hood Poems’, in Knight, S. T. (ed.) Robin Hood: An Anthology of Scholarship and Criticism. Boydell & Brewer, pp. 3–38.Blanchette, J.-F. (2012) Burdens of Proog: Cryptographic Culture and Evidence Law in the Age of Electronic Documents. MIT Press.Morgan K. O. (2010) The Oxford History of Britain. Oxford University Press.Hanawalt, B. A. (1979) Crime and Conflict in English Communities. Harvard University Press.McKnight, H. (1981) The Shell Book of the Inland Waterways. David and Charles.Harding, V. (2002) The Dead and the Living in Paris and London, 1500–1670. Cambridge University Press.Keen, M. H. (1973) England in the Later Middle Ages. Methuen.Peters, E. (1970) The Shadow King: Rex Inutilis in Meieval Law and Literature, 751–1327. Yale University Press.Dunham, W. H. and Wood, C. T. (1976) ‘The Right to Rule in England: depositions and the Kingdom’s Authority, 1327–1485’, The American Historical Review, 81(4), pp. 738–761. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1864778.Baker, J. H. (1990) An Introduction to English Legal History. 3rd edn. Butterworths.Hanawalt, B. A. (1975) ‘Fur-Collar Crime: The Pattern of Crime among the Fourteenth-Century Nobility’, Journal of Social History, 8(4), pp. 1–17.Musson, A. (2001) Public Order and Law Enforcement: The Local Administration of Criminal Justice 1294–1350. Boydell Press.Ohlgren, W. M. (2000) ‘Edwardus Redivivus in a “Gest of Robyn Hode”’, The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 99, pp. 1–28.Hayman, R. (2003) Trees: Woodlands and Western Civilization. Palgrave Macmillan.Firth Green, R. (1999) A Crisis of Truth: Literature and Law in Ricardian England. University of Pennsylvania Press.Feldman, D. (1988) ‘The King’s Peace, the Royal Prerogative and Public Order: The Roots and Early Development of Binding over Powers’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 47, pp. 101–128.Crook, D. (1987) ‘Hardwick Before Bess: The Origins and Early History of the Hardwick Family and their Estate’, Derbyshire Archaeological Journal, 107, pp. 41–54.King, E. (1991) ‘The West Midlands’, in Miller, E. and Thirsk, J. (eds) The Agrarian History of England and Wales. Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–77.Stones, E. L. G. (1957) ‘The Folvilles of Ashby-Folville, Leicestershire, and Their Associates in Crime, 1326–1347’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 7, pp. 117–136. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3678889.Olgive, M. and Harvey, J. (2000) The Biographical Dictionary of Women in Science: Pioneering Lives from Ancient Times to the mid-20th Century. Routledge.Keen, M. H. (2000) The Outlaws of Medieval Legend. Routledge.Bellamy, J. G. (1964) ‘The Coterel Gang: An Anatomy of a Band of Fourteenth-Century Criminals’, The English Historical Review, 79, pp. 698–717.Payling, S. J. (2004) ‘Willoughby, Sir Richard (c. 1290–1362)’, in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. online. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/29601.Bellamy, J. G. (1973) Crime and Public Order in Emgland in the Later Middle Ages. Routledge and Keegan Paul.Hanawalt, B. A. (1974) ‘The Peasant Family and Crime in Fourteenth-Century England’, Journal of British Studies, 13(2), pp. 1–18.Rogers, R. V. (1941) ‘A Source for Fitzherbert’s “La Graunde Abridgement”’, The English Historical Review, 56, pp. 605–628.
- &nbe="citation_20">&nbe="citation_21">&nbe="citation_22">&nbe="citation_23">&nbe="citation_24">&nbe="citation_25">&nbe="citation_26">&nbe="citation_27"> p. 47
- &nbe="citation_29">&nbe="citation_30">&nbe="citation_31">&nbe="citation_32"> p. 175
- &nbe="citation_34">&nbe="citation_35"> pp. 172–173